David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Is there such a thing as a philosophical method? It seems that there are as many philosophical methods as there are philosophies. A method is any procedure employed to achieve a certain aim. So, before proposing a method, we have to tackle the delicate question: “what is the aim of philosophy?”. At the origin of philosophy, there is a questioning about the world. The worldview approach developed by Leo Apostel elegantly explicit those fundamental questions. As we answer them, we come up with a worldview. Using this framework, this paper consider answering this enduring philosophical agenda as the primary aim of philosophy. We illustrate the approach by pointing out the limitations of both a strictly scientific worldview and a strictly religious worldview. We then argue that philosophical worldviews constitute a particular class of possible worldviews. With the help of three analogies, we give guidelines to construct such worldviews. The next step is to compare the relative strength of philosophical worldviews. Precise evaluation standards to compare and confront worldviews are proposed. Some problems for worldview diffusion are then expounded. We close with basic hypotheses to build a comprehensive philosophical worldview.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Clément Vidal (2010). Computational and Biological Analogies for Understanding Fine-Tuned Parameters in Physics. Foundations of Science 15 (4):375 - 393.
Similar books and articles
Knut J. Ims & Ove D. Jakobsen (2006). Cooperation and Competition in the Context of Organic and Mechanic Worldviews – a Theoretical and Case Based Discussion. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):19 - 32.
Peter Kakol (2002). A General Theory of Worldviews Based on Madhyamika and Process Philosophies. Philosophy East and West 52 (2):207-223.
Richard DeWitt (2010). Worldviews: An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Science. Wiley-Blackwell.
David Kim, Dan Fisher & David McCalman (2009). Modernism, Christianity, and Business Ethics: A Worldview Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 90 (1):115 - 121.
Pieter Meurs (2011). The Bodily Excess of a Worldview: Beyond a Theoretical Account of the World. In D. Aerts, B. D'Hooghe & N. Note (eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and Its Implications for Our Perspectives of the World. World Scientific
Liane Gabora (2004). Ideas Are Not Replicators but Minds Are. Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):127-143.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #90,983 of 1,699,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?