David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 19 (2):191-206 (2004)
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Given a system of logic we have a Norma, a standard of correctness. The problem is that we need another Norma to establish when the standard of correctness is to be applied. Subsequently we start by clarifying the senses in which the term ‘Iogic’ and the term ‘normativity’ are being used. Then we explore two different epistemologies for logic to see the sort of defence of the normativity of logic they allow for; if any. The analysis concentrates on the case of classical logic. In particular the issue will be appraised from the perspective put forward by the epistemology based on the methodology of wide reflective equilibrium and the scientific one underlying the view of logic as model
|Keywords||normativity logic wide reflective equilibrium view of logic as model|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Thagard (1982). From the Descriptive to the Normative in Psychology and Logic. Philosophy of Science 49 (1):24-42.
Kristin Shrader-Frechette & Earl D. Mccoy (1994). Applied Ecology and the Logic of Case Studies. Philosophy of Science 61 (2):228-249.
Newton C. A. da Costa & Décio Krause, Remarks on the Applications of Paraconsistent Logic to Physics.
Ralph Wedgwood (2007). The Nature of Normativity. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Aberdein & Stephen Read (2009). The Philosophy of Alternative Logics. In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press. 613-723.
Michael D. Resnik (1985). Logic: Normative or Descriptive? The Ethics of Belief or a Branch of Psychology? Philosophy of Science 52 (2):221-238.
Jeremy Randel Koons (2003). Consensus and Excellence of Reasons. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:83-103.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?