Approach for qualitative validation using aggregated data for a stochastic simulation model of the spread of the bovine viral-diarrhoea virus in a dairy cattle herd
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Biotheoretica 54 (3):207-217 (2006)
Qualitative validation consists in showing that a model is able to mimic available observed data. In population level biological models, the available data frequently represent a group status, such as pool testing, rather than the individual statuses. They are aggregated. Our objective was to explore an approach for qualitative validation of a model with aggregated data and to apply it to validate a stochastic model simulating the bovine viral-diarrhoea virus (BVDV) spread within a dairy cattle herd. Repeated measures of the level of BVDV-specific antibodies in the bulk-tank milk (total milk production of a herd) were used to summarise the BVDV herd status. First, a domain of validation was defined to ensure a comparison restricted to dynamics of pathogen spread well identified among observed aggregated data (new herd infection with a wide BVDV spread). For simulations, scenarios were defined and simulation outputs at the individual animal level were aggregated at the herd level using an aggregation function. Comparison was done only for observed data and simulated aggregated outputs that were in the domain of validation. The validity of our BVDV model was not rejected. Drawbacks and ways of improvement of the approach are discussed.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy of Biology Evolutionary Biology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Riesen & Gursel Serpen (2008). Validation of a Bayesian Belief Network Representation for Posterior Probability Calculations on National Crime Victimization Survey. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):245-276.
Alvin I. Goldman & Chandra S. Sripada (2005). Simulationist Models of Face-Based Emotion Recognition. Cognition 94 (3):193-213.
Ilan Fischer & Ravid Bogaire (2012). The Group Calibration Index: A Group-Based Approach for Assessing Forecasters' Expertise When External Outcome Data Are Missing. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision 73 (4):671-685.
N. Halberg, E. Steen Kristensen & I. Sillebak Kristensen (1995). Nitrogen Turnover on Organic and Conventional Mixed Farms. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (1):30-51.
Matthew W. Parker (2009). Computing the Uncomputable; or, the Discrete Charm of Second-Order Simulacra. Synthese 169 (3):447 - 463.
Göran Svensson, Greg Wood, Jang Singh, Janice M. Payan & Michael Callaghan (2011). The Embeddedness of Codes of Ethics in Organizations in Australia, Canada and the United States. Business Ethics 20 (4):405-417.
Luis Sanz & Rafael Bravo de la Parra (1998). Variables Aggregation in Time Varying Discrete Systems. Acta Biotheoretica 46 (3):273-297.
Gary Feng (2003). Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater: Problems in Modeling Aggregated Eye-Movement Data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):482-483.
Claire Martinet-Edelist (2003). Feedback Circuits in Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Acta Biotheoretica 51 (4):245-263.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #346,132 of 1,780,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,797 of 1,780,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?