Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2) (2009)
|Abstract||In this paper, we explore the role of reciprocity in the employment of restrictive measures in contexts of contagion. Reciprocity should be understood as a substantive value that governs the use, level and extent of restrictive measures. We also argue that independent of the role reciprocity plays in the legitimisation the use of restrictive measures, reciprocity can also motivate support and compliance with legitimate restrictive measures. The importance of reciprocity has implications for how restrictive measures should be undertaken when preparing and evaluating public health responses to contagion.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. H. Van Hooren [ (2008). Providing Good Care in the Context of Restrictive Measures : The Case of Prevention of Obesity in Youngsters with Prader-Willi Syndrome. In Guy Widdershoven (ed.), Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
R. H. van Hooren (2008). Providing Good Care in the Context of Restrictive Measures : The Case of Prevention of Obesity in Youngsters with Prader-Willi Syndrome. In Guy Widdershoven (ed.), Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Michael Rescorla (2009). Assertion and its Constitutive Norms. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):98-130.
Erik Angner (2011). Are Subjective Measures of Well-Being 'Direct'? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):115-130.
Marguerite la Caze (2008). Seeing Oneself Through the Eyes of the Other: Asymmetrical Reciprocity and Self-Respect. Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 118-135.
Wolfgang Frisch, Restrictive Measures That Follow an Acquital by Reason of Insufficient Mental Capability in the System of Criminal Law Legal Consequences.
Edmund Henden (2007). Restrictive Consequentialism and Real Friendship. Ratio 20 (2):179–193.
Michael Moody (2008). Serial Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. Sociological Theory 26 (2):130 - 151.
S. Faust Halley, M. Bensimon Cécile & E. G. Upshur Ross (2009). The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in the Ethical Aspects of Pandemic Flu Planning—Lessons Learned From the Toronto Sars Experience. Public Health Ethics 2 (1).
A. M. Viens (2011). Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law. In Michael Freeman (ed.), Law and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-05-18
Total downloads8 ( #122,991 of 549,011 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,011 )
How can I increase my downloads?