Your liberty or your life: Reciprocity in the use of restrictive measures in contexts of contagion [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):207-217 (2009)
In this paper, we explore the role of reciprocity in the employment of restrictive measures in contexts of contagion. Reciprocity should be understood as a substantive value that governs the use, level and extent of restrictive measures. We also argue that independent of the role reciprocity plays in the legitimisation the use of restrictive measures, reciprocity can also motivate support and compliance with legitimate restrictive measures. The importance of reciprocity has implications for how restrictive measures should be undertaken when preparing and evaluating public health responses to contagion.
|Keywords||Reciprocity Restrictive measures Infectious disease Ethics Quarantine Isolation Liberty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Françoise Baylis, Nuala P. Kenny & Susan Sherwin (2008). A Relational Account of Public Health Ethics. Public Health Ethics 1 (3):196-209.
James F. Childress, Ruth R. Faden, Ruth D. Gaare, Lawrence O. Gostin, Jeffrey Kahn, Richard J. Bonnie, Nancy E. Kass, Anna C. Mastroianni, Jonathan D. Moreno & Phillip Nieburg (2002). Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (2):170-178.
Richard Coker, Marianna Thomas, Karen Lock & Robyn Martin (2007). Detention and the Evolving Threat of Tuberculosis: Evidence, Ethics, and Law. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):609-615.
William A. Edmundson (1998). Legitimate Authority Without Political Obligation. Law and Philosophy 17 (1):43 - 60.
John Harris & Søren Holm (1993). If Only AIDS Were Different! Hastings Center Report 23 (6):6-12.
Citations of this work BETA
Joint Centre for Bioethics Pandemic (2009). Public Engagement on Social Distancing in a Pandemic: A Canadian Perspective. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):15-17.
Michael Selgelid (2009). Promoting Justice, Trust, Compliance, and Health: The Case for Compensation. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):22-24.
Similar books and articles
R. H. Van Hooren [ (2008). Providing Good Care in the Context of Restrictive Measures : The Case of Prevention of Obesity in Youngsters with Prader-Willi Syndrome. In Guy Widdershoven (ed.), Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
S. Faust Halley, M. Bensimon Cécile & E. G. Upshur Ross (2009). The Role of Faith-Based Organizations in the Ethical Aspects of Pandemic Flu Planning—Lessons Learned From the Toronto Sars Experience. Public Health Ethics 2 (1).
Michael Moody (2008). Serial Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. Sociological Theory 26 (2):130 - 151.
Edmund Henden (2007). Restrictive Consequentialism and Real Friendship. Ratio 20 (2):179–193.
Wolfgang Frisch, Restrictive Measures That Follow an Acquital by Reason of Insufficient Mental Capability in the System of Criminal Law Legal Consequences.
Marguerite la Caze (2008). Seeing Oneself Through the Eyes of the Other: Asymmetrical Reciprocity and Self-Respect. Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 118-135.
Erik Angner (2011). Are Subjective Measures of Well-Being 'Direct'? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):115 - 130.
Michael Rescorla (2009). Assertion and its Constitutive Norms. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):98-130.
R. H. van Hooren (2008). Providing Good Care in the Context of Restrictive Measures : The Case of Prevention of Obesity in Youngsters with Prader-Willi Syndrome. In Guy Widdershoven (ed.), Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
A. M. Viens (2011). Reciprocity and Neuroscience in Public Health Law. In Michael Freeman (ed.), Law and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-05-18
Total downloads9 ( #128,915 of 1,089,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,057 )
How can I increase my downloads?