Asymmetries in the Friendship Preferences and Social Styles of Men and Women

Human Nature 18 (2):143-161 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several hypotheses on the form and function of sex differences in social behaviors were tested. The results suggest that friendship preferences in both sexes can be understood in terms of perceived reciprocity potential—capacity and willingness to engage in a mutually beneficial relationship. Divergent social styles may in turn reflect trade-offs between behaviors selected to maintain large, functional coalitions in men and intimate, secure relationships in women. The findings are interpreted from a broad socio-relational framework of the types of behaviors that facilitate selective advertisement and investment of reciprocity potential across individuals and within groups of men and women

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Amicitia in Plautus: A Study of Roman Friendship Processes.Paul J. Burton - 2004 - American Journal of Philology 125 (2):209-243.
Sex Differences in Reciprocal Altruism: Reply to Mower.David C. Geary - 2009 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (1):121-124.
Altruism, altruistic punishment and social investment.Klaus Jaffe - 2004 - Acta Biotheoretica 52 (3):155-172.
Altruism is a social behavior.Richard Schuster - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):272-274.
Mice in the Sink.Jessica Pierce - 2008 - Environmental Philosophy 5 (1):75-96.
Mind reading, deception and the evolution of Kantian moral agents.Alejandro Rosas - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (2):127–139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
62 (#254,324)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?