David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):547-564 (2004)
When hard determinists reject the claim that people deserve particular kinds of treatment because of how they have acted, they are left with a problem about remorse. Remorse is often represented as a way we impose retribution on ourselves when we understand that we have acted badly. (This view of remorse appears in the work of Freud, and I think it fits our everyday, pretheoretical understanding of one kind of remorse.) Retribution of any kind cannot be appropriate if we do not deserve bad treatment because of how we have acted. But remorse seems to be essentially bound up with understanding that we have acted badly. If this is right, it is important for hard determinists to find a non-retributive account of remorse, so that they can accommodate remorse within their theories. My goal in this paper is to provide such an account. I describe a kind of remorse which I think is a common human experience, a kind which is based on suffering in sympathy with the person one has wronged. It is similar to suffering in sympathy with one's friends when they suffer. We suffer in sympathy with friends not because we think we deserve to, but because we care about them, and their suffering gives us pain. In the wake of a wrongful act, a "virtuous wrongdoer" comes to care about the person wronged, and suffers in sympathy with him. This kind of remorse can be accommodated by hard determinists.
|Keywords||free will hard determinism reactive attitudes remorse virtue ethics sympathy empathy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Benjamin Vilhauer (2008). Hard Determinism, Humeanism, and Virtue Ethics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):121-144.
Ben Vilhauer (2008). Hard Determinism, Humeanism, and Virtue Ethics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):121-144.
Richard L. Lippke (2008). Response to Tudor: Remorse-Based Sentence Reductions in Theory and Practice. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):259-268.
Anne Thomson (1989). Emotional Origins of Morality ‐‐ A Sketch. Journal of Moral Education 18 (3):199-207.
Steven Tudor (2008). Remorse, Reform and the Real World: Reply to Lippke. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):269-272.
Stephen De Wijze (2005). Tragic-Remorse — the Anguish of Dirty Hands. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):453 - 471.
Stephen De Wijze (2005). Tragic-Remorse–the Anguish of Dirty Hands. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):453-471.
Steven Keith Tudor (2008). Why Should Remorse Be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing? Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):241-257.
Added to index2009-04-11
Total downloads37 ( #115,993 of 1,934,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,672 of 1,934,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?