David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP USA (1999)
This book explores the role of aesthetic experience in our perception and understanding of the holy. Richard Viladesaus goal is to articulate a theology of revelation, examined in relation to three principal dimensions of the aesthetic realm: feeling and imagination; beauty (or taste); and the arts. After briefly considering ways in which theology itself can be imaginative or beautiful, Viladesau concentrates on the theological significance of aesthetic data provided by each of the three major spheres of aesthetic perception and response. Throughout the work, the underlying question is how each of these spheres serves as a source (however ambiguous) of revelation. Although he frames much of his argument in terms of Catholic theology--from the Church Fathers to Karl Rahner, Hans urs von Balthasar, Bernard Lonergan, and David Tracy--Viladesau also makes extensive use of ideas from the Protestant theologian of the arts Gerardus van der Leeuw, and draws insights from such diverse thinkers as Hans Goerg Gadamer, Wolfhart Pannenberg, and Iris Murdoch. His analysis is enlivened by the artistic examples he selects: the music of Mozart as contemplated by Karl Barth, Schoenbergs opera Moses und Aron, the sculptures of Chartres Cathedral, poems by Rilke and Michelangelo, and many others. What emerges from this study is what Viladeseau terms a transcendental theology of aesthetics. In Thomistic terms, he finds that beauty is not only a perfection but a transcendental. That is, any instance of beauty, rightly perceived and rightly understood, can be seen to imply divinely beautiful things as well. In other words, Viladesau argues, God is the absolute and necessary condition for the possibility of beauty.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.45 used (93% off) $87.32 new (12% off) $92.62 direct from Amazon (7% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Glenn B. Siniscalchi (2013). Prospects for Developing the Via Empirica in a Post-Conciliar Church. Heythrop Journal 54 (2):181-196.
Similar books and articles
Peter K. Walhout (2009). The Beautiful and the Sublime in Natural Science. Zygon 44 (4):757-776.
John D. Dadosky (2007). Philosophy for a Theology of Beauty. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):7-34.
Nick Zangwill (2003). Beauty. In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Oxford Companion to Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Roger Scruton (2009). Beauty. Oxford University Press.
Paul Guyer (2005). Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
Andrea Sauchelli (2013). Functional Beauty, Perception, and Aesthetic Judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):41-53.
Ronald Hepburn (2001). Theological Aesthetics: God in Imagination, Beauty, and Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2):232-234.
Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) (1993). Landscape, Natural Beauty, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Viladesau (1988). Natural Theology and Aesthetics. Philosophy and Theology 3 (2):145-159.
Gernot Böhme (2010). On Beauty. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39).
Piero Ferrucci (2009). Beauty and the Soul: The Extraordinary Power of Everyday Beauty to Heal Your Life. Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
John D. Dadosky (2009). Recovering Beauty in the Subject. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):509-532.
Graham McFee (2005). The Artistic and the Aesthetic. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (4):368-387.
Joe Winston (2010). Beauty and Education. Routledge.
Susan Best (2005). Mild Intoxication and Other Aesthetic Feelings. Angelaki 10 (3):157 – 170.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?