David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In the present essay Kantian prohibition against scientific cosmology is discussed. It is shown that the possibility of such a science is based essentially on a hypothetico-deductive use of the cosmological principle. Moreover the epistemological character of the latter is investigated, in order to prove that it has no a priori character, against the received view on the topics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William Lane Craig (1993). Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford University Press.
H. G. Quaritch Wales (1977). The Universe Around Them: Cosmology and Cosmic Renewal in Indianized South-East Asia. A. Probsthain.
F. Bertola & Umberto Curi (eds.) (1988). The Anthropic Principle: Proceedings of the Second Venice Conference on Cosmology and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Hans Halvorson (forthcoming). Theism and Physical Cosmology. In Charles Taliaferro, Victoria Harrison & Stewart Goetz (eds.), Routledge Companion to Theism.
Jan Such (2007). The Peculiar Status of Cosmology As a Science. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:73-80.
Pierre Kerszberg (1987). On the Alleged Equivalence Between Newtonian and Relativistic Cosmology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (3):347-380.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #211,273 of 1,099,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #303,541 of 1,099,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?