Ockham on terms of first and second imposition and intention, with remarks on the liar paradox
Vivarium 19 (1):47-55 (1981)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMatt Leonard (2012). Burge's Contextual Theory of Truth and the Super-Liar Paradox. In Michal Pelis Vit Puncochar (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2011. College Publications.
Stamatios Gerogiorgakis (2009). The Byzantine Liar. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (4):313-330.
Richard Kenneth Atkins (2011). This Proposition is Not True: C.S. Peirce and the Liar Paradox. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (4):421-444.
Bradley Dowden, Liar Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jeff Snapper (2012). The Liar Paradox in New Clothes. Analysis 72 (2):319-322.
Hester Goodenough Gelber (1984). I Cannot Tell a Lie. Hugh Lawton's Critique of Ockham on Mental Language. Franciscan Studies 44:141-179.
Keith Simmons (1987). On a Medieval Solution to the Liar Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (2):121-140.
Paolo Crivelli (2004). Aristotle on the Liar. Topoi 23 (1):61-70.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #74,758 of 549,520 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,520 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
