David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98 (2010)
Various authors debate the question of whether neuroscience is relevant to criminal responsibility. However, a plethora of different techniques and technologies, each with their own abilities and drawbacks, lurks beneath the label “neuroscience”; and in criminal law responsibility is not a single, unitary and generic concept, but it is rather a syndrome of at least six different concepts. Consequently, there are at least six different responsibility questions that the criminal law asks – at least one for each responsibility concept – and, I will suggest, a multitude of ways in which the techniques and technologies that comprise neuroscience might help us to address those diverse questions. In a way, on my account neuroscience is relevant to criminal responsibility in many ways, but I hesitate to state my position like this because doing so obscures two points which I would rather highlight: one, neither neuroscience nor criminal responsibility are as unified as that; and two, the criminal law asks many different responsibility questions and not just one generic question.
|Keywords||responsibility neuroscience criminal law neurolaw|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Leonard V. Kaplan (2004). Truth and/or Consequences : Neuroscience and Criminal Responsibility. In Susan Pockett (ed.), Does Consciousness Cause Behaviour? Mit Press.
Katrina Sifferd (2012). Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment. In A. Santosuosso (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Law and Science Young Scholars Symposium. Pavia University Press.
Nicola Lacey (2007). Space, Time and Function: Intersecting Principles of Responsibility Across the Terrain of Criminal Justice. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):233-250.
Michael Pardo & Dennis Patterson (2011). Minds, Brains, and Norms. Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.
Dennis Patterson (2011). Minds, Brains, and Norms. Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.
Michael J. Gorr & Sterling Harwood (eds.) (1992). Controversies in Criminal Law: Philosophical Essays on Responsibility and Procedure. Westview Press.
Victor Tadros (2007). Criminal Responsibility. OUP Oxford.
Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Antony Duff (2009). Legal and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Added to index2009-12-21
Total downloads162 ( #3,153 of 1,012,026 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #2,939 of 1,012,026 )
How can I increase my downloads?