Study of a Cognitive Dissonance Intervention to Address High School Students' Cheating Attitudes and Behaviors
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 19 (3):218-226 (2009)
Forty-four high school students took part in focus-type group that used an induced hypocrisy paradigm developed from cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957) to reduce cheating behavior. Posttesting following the intervention showed that, contrary to expectations, these students' attitudes toward cheating and self-reported cheating behaviors did not decrease relative to those of 65 control participants who did not participate in the group intervention. All participants reported a greater intention to cheat in the future at posttest as well as an increase in cheating behavior. Although participants did not view cheating favorably, a large majority admitted cheating and indicated that they had never been caught
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gordon F. Woodbine & Vimala Amirthalingam (2013). Dishonesty in the Classroom: The Effect of Cognitive Dissonance and the Mitigating Influence of Religious Commitment. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (2):139-155.
Sara Staats & Julie M. Hupp (2012). An Examination of Academic Misconduct Intentions and the Ineffectiveness of Syllabus Statements. Ethics and Behavior 22 (4):239 - 247.
Similar books and articles
Georgiana Shick Tryon & Edward J. Vinski (2009). Study of a Cognitive Dissonance Intervention to Address High School Students' Cheating Attitudes and Behaviors. Ethics and Behavior 19 (3):218-226.
Vivien K. G. Lim & Sean K. B. See (2001). Attitudes Toward, and Intentions to Report, Academic Cheating Among Students in Singapore. Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):261 – 274.
Mollie K. Galloway (2012). Cheating in Advantaged High Schools: Prevalence, Justifications, and Possibilities for Change. Ethics and Behavior 22 (5):378 - 399.
Trevor S. Harding, Matthew J. Mayhew, Cynthia J. Finelli & Donald D. Carpenter (2007). The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):255 – 279.
Jennifer Yardley & Melanie Domenech Rodr (2009). True Confessions?: Alumni's Retrospective Reports on Undergraduate Cheating Behaviors. Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):1 – 14.
Peter W. Schuhmann, Robert T. Burrus, Preston D. Barber, J. Edward Graham & M. Fara Elikai (2013). Using the Scenario Method to Analyze Cheating Behaviors. Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (1):17-33.
Marek Preiss, Helen A. Klein, Nancy M. Levenburg & Alena Nohavova (2013). A Cross-Country Evaluation of Cheating in Academia—A Comparison of Data From the US and the Czech Republic. Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (2):157-167.
Helen A. Klein, Nancy M. Levenburg, Marie McKendall & William Mothersell (2007). Cheating During the College Years: How Do Business School Students Compare? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (2):197 - 206.
Richard A. Bernardi, Rene L. Metzger, Ryann G. Scofield Bruno, Marisa A. Wade Hoogkamp, Lillian E. Reyes & Gary H. Barnaby (2004). Examining the Decision Process of Students' Cheating Behavior: An Empirical Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):397-414.
Jennifer Akeley Spear & Ann Neville Miller (2012). The Effects of Instructor Fear Appeals and Moral Appeals on Cheating-Related Attitudes and Behavior of University Students. Ethics and Behavior 22 (3):196 - 207.
David A. Rettinger & Augustus E. Jordan (2005). Articles: The Relations Among Religion, Motivation, and College Cheating: A Natural Experiment. Ethics and Behavior 15 (2):107 – 129.
Jason M. Stephens, Michael F. Young & Thomas Calabrese (2007). Does Moral Judgment Go Offline When Students Are Online? A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduates' Beliefs and Behaviors Related to Conventional and Digital Cheating. Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):233 – 254.
Kathleen K. Molnar & Marilyn G. Kletke (2012). Does the Type of Cheating Influence Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Cheating? Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (3):201-212.
Kenneth J. Smith, Jeanette A. Davy & Debbie Easterling (2004). An Examination of Cheating and its Antecedents Among Marketing and Management Majors. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):63-80.
Added to index2010-08-28
Total downloads7 ( #185,233 of 1,100,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,065 of 1,100,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?