De sterfelijkheid Van de transcendentie: Levinas en het kwaad

Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 65 (1):59 - 92 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Transcendence, Levinas tells us, is not a failed immanence. It presupposes an Exteriority that cannot be integrated into a totality. Such is its excellence: a surplus that rends Being's monism and allows for a pluralism that is not a "missed union". In the first sections of this article I show how the ethical relation with the Other is the only one that, for Levinas, satisfies the conditions he thus imposes on a metaphysical — i.e. transcendent — relation. I subsequently link this 'return' to Plato's idea of a 'Good beyond Being' to the problem of Evil. If Evil is the refusal of the Good, we should, of course, first understand what it means that, as Levinas contends, the Good has chosen us before we could choose it. Are we to think of this 'election' as a command or as an invitation? Concretely: is the appeal of the Other something one cannot not hear, or does it only have the force to disturb those who "retain it"? In other words: should one think of Evil in terms of a choice for irresponsibility which is already situated in the horizon of a responsibility one cannot refuse; or should what in the former case is called Evil, not rather be thought of in terms of a deafness that is sui generis and not the privation of a hearing that ought to be there? Could there not be an irresponsibility that is not the refusal of responsibility, and that, instead of being situated within ethics, would rather complicate our way of conceiving the ethical relation? In the last section I oppose to Levinas's way of conceiving the relation between transcendence and immanence a different approach: the Good is inevitably incarnated and thus pluralized to a point where it becomes difficult to still present it as the Good. Incarnating the transcendent is not merely wrapping it in a context which leaves it unaltered. The incarnans is not just the envelope for the incarnatum. It is its "originary supplement" (Derrida). But then, inevitably, the relation between 'the' Good and 'Being' becomes anti-platonic: transcendence becomes mortal and fragile. It can bleed! It is in terms of such bleeding that we ought to look at some of the conflicts that trouble our societies — multiculturalism being one example amongst others

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The "Ethical Anthropic Principle" and the Religious Ethics of Levinas.A. T. Nuyen - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):427 - 442.
De onteigening. Hoe te zwijgen na Levinas.Rudi Visker - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (4):631 - 666.
L'idée de l'infini : Descartes dans la pensée d'Emmanuel Lévinas.Jean-François Lavigne - 1987 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 92 (1):54 - 66.
Levinas and the Euthanasia Debate.A. T. Nuyen - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):119 - 135.
In/finite Time: Tracing Transcendence to Emmanuel Levinas's Talmudic Lectures.Ethan Kleinberg - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (3):375-387.
No exit: Levinas' aporetic account of transcendence.Robert Bernasconi - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):101-117.
An other face of ethics in Levinas.Barbara Jane Davy - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):39-66.
Adorno and extreme evil.Espen Hammer - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
19 (#683,238)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references