Flash! Fodor splits the atom
Analysis 61 (1):5-10 (2001)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Belief Concept Epistemology Molecularism Fodor, J | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKenneth R. Livingston (1993). What Fodor Means: Some Thoughts on Reading Jerry Fodor's A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Philosophical Psychology 6 (3):289-301.
Daniel A. Weiskopf & William P. Bechtel (2004). Remarks on Fodor on Having Concepts. Mind and Language 19 (1):48-56.
Peter Mott (1992). Fodor and Ceteris Paribus Laws. Mind 101 (402):335-46.
Robert D. Rupert (2000). Dispositions Indisposed: Semantic Atomism and Fodor's Theory of Content. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):325-349.
Michael Devitt (1991). Why Fodor Can't Have It Both Ways. In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
John-Michael M. Kuczynski (2004). Another Argument Against the Thesis That There is a Language of Thought. Communication and Cognition 37 (2):83-103.
John Sarnecki (2006). Retracing Our Steps: Fodor's New Old Way with Concept Acquisition. Acta Analytica 21 (40):41-73.
A. Levine & Mark H. Bickhard (1999). Concepts: Where Fodor Went Wrong. Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):5-23.
Don Ross (1986). Stich, Fodor and the Status of Belief. Eidos 5 (December):119-141.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads19 ( #65,306 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,895 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
