Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):643-644 (2002)
|Abstract||We support Shanker & King's (S&K's) proposal for a dynamic systems approach in ape language research, but question their vision of what it means to have language. Language plays an essential role in the making of the human mind. It underlies any kind of human interaction and codetermines perception and action. Moreover, what gives human thought the very characteristic architecture of textuality criterially requires a third party.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Grant Gillett (1991). Language, Social Ecology and Experience. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):195 – 203.
Jan Pieter M. A. Maes (2005). On Sticking Labels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):503-504.
Edward Kako (2002). What Ape Language Research Means for Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):629-629.
Peter Carruthers (1998). Distinctively Human Thinking. In Peter Carruthers & Jill Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought. Cambridge.
Abraham Mansbach (2002). Beyond Subjectivism: Heidegger on Language and the Human Being. Greenwood Press.
Emmanuel Gilissen (2004). Aspects of Human Language: Where Motherese? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):514-514.
John L. Locke (2002). Dancing with Humans: Interaction as Unintended Consequence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):632-633.
Chris Westbury (2002). Blind Men, Elephants, and Dancing Information Processors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):645-646.
Wolff-Michael Roth & Daniel V. Lawless (2002). How Does the Body Get Into the Mind? Human Studies 25 (3):333-358.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #123,161 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?