Topoi 29 (2):109-123 (2010)
|Abstract||Although a number of truth theorists have claimed that a deflationary theory of ‘is true’ needs nothing more than the uniform implication of instances of the theorem ‘the proposition that p is true if and only if p ’, reflection shows that this is inadequate. If deflationists can’t support the instances when replacing the biconditional with ‘because’, then their view is in peril. Deflationists sometimes acknowledge this by addressing, occasionally attempting to deflate, ‘because’ and ‘in virtue of’ formulas and their close relatives. I examine what I take to be the most promising deflationist moves in this direction and argue that they fail.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael P. Lynch (2013). Expressivism and Plural Truth. Philosophical Studies 163 (2):385-401.
Alex Barber (2003). Truth Conditions and Their Recognition. In Alex Barber (ed.), Epistemology of Language. Oxford University Press.
Charles Sayward (1987). Prior’s Theory of Truth. Analysis 47 (2):83-87.
Matthew McGrath (1997). Weak Deflationism. Mind 106 (421):69-98.
Michael McDermott (2009). Truth and Assertability. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (4):465 - 470.
C. Travis (1996). Meaning's Role in Truth. Mind 105 (419):451-466.
Stephan Torre (2009). Truth-Conditions, Truth-Bearers and the New B-Theory of Time. Philosophical Studies 142 (3):325-344.
David Liggins (2008). Truthmakers and the Groundedness of Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (2):177-196.
Added to index2010-01-16
Total downloads32 ( #43,414 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,756 of 722,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?