David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Perspectives 6 (2):159-168 (1999)
Multiculturalism is not a recent phenomenon. From the moment a different world appears, a different culture in which the evidence of the cultural world in which I participate is put out of play, we are confronted with the problem of a split between the world as such and my world, which is only one among others, and we find ourselves compelled to seek a solution.One such solution would be to try to deny the split by restricting the meaning of `world' to one's own world alone; another one would be to welcome the split as allowing us to understand that humanity must ultimately be sought beyond all particularism. But it is not by looking at such classical solutions which, though unsatisfactory, are still with us, that we will understand what might be new in this multiculturalism that so commands our attention.What is new is neither the problem posed by it nor the solutions we have found for it, but our fascination with the phenomenon. It is indeed only very recently that the word `multiculturalism' itself has begun to take over from that other key word which fascinated us for so many years: we no longer expect `postmodernism' to provide the answers to all our enigmas, but multiculturalism.This fascination is somewhat surprising. In order to understand it, we will have to try not to let it captivate us. And perhaps it has already captivated us as soon as we see in it only the name of a problem to which we must find a solution as soon as possible. Hence a series of counter-questions: What is it about multiculturalism that manages not only to fascinate us, but also to make us believe that our fascination merely points out the urgency of a problem that only concerns us to the extent that it concerns others? Whence the tendency to treat the multicultural as something that primarily deals with the existence — ethical or political — of the other, and hence as something that implicates us in an intrigue that interpellates us only in that dimension of our existence that we are content to call our ethical or political responsibility?Multiculturalism would put us `in response' to the other. It would thus be of concern to that part of our subjectivity in which we find ourselves linked to others. But it would not cut deeper than that. As if our fascination for the other would not engage us in another aspect of our being, as if our `non-intersubjective' subjectivity had nothing to do with it, as if our very existence were only implicated in the multicultural by the threads of an intersubjectivity which are only the warp of a subjectivity already there, and ultimately unaffected by it. Let us pause for a moment to consider what is seductive about this logic of the `as if', for it is in this logic that most ethical and political approaches to the multicultural seem to find their point of departure
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rudi Visker (2008). The Inhuman Condition: Looking for Difference After Levinas and Heidegger. Duquesne University Press.
Rudi Visker (2006). Lecture 4: A Satrian in Disguise : Levinas on Racism. In John D. Caputo & David L. Smith (eds.), Levinas: The Face of the Other: The Fifteenth Annual Symposium of the Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center. Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center, Duquesne University
Harvey Siegel (1999). Multiculturalism and the Possibility of Transcultural Educational and Philosophical Ideals. Philosophy 74 (3):387-409.
Rudi Visker (1997). The Core of My Opposition to Levinas. Ethical Perspectives 4 (3):154-170.
Steven Weimer (2007). Polyglot Multiculturalism and Social Progress. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):275-288.
Rudi Visker (1996). Dis-Possessed: How to Remain Silent ?After? Levinas. [REVIEW] Man and World 29 (2):119-146.
Harriet Erica Baber (2008). The Multicultural Mystique: The Liberal Case Against Diversity. Prometheus Books.
Michael L. Morgan (2005). Levinas and Judaism. Levinas Studies 1:1-17.
Demuijnck Geert (2008). Multiculturalism, Collective Identities and Special Obligations to Compatriots. In Artur Szutta (ed.), Multiculturalism. What Common Identity?
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Emilia Guliciuc (2008). Multiculturalism, Globalization And Postmodernism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 30:11-16.
Joseph Raz (1998). Multiculturalism. Ratio Juris 11 (3):193-205.
Bettina Bergo (2008). A Site From Which to Hope? Levinas Studies 3:117-142.
Martin J. B. Matustik (2002). Contribution to a New Critical Theory of Multiculturalism: A Response to 'Anti-Racism, Multiculturalism and the Ethics of Identification'. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (4):473-482.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads18 ( #206,083 of 1,906,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,378 of 1,906,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?