Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Quarterly 19 (77):289-301 (1969)
|Abstract||This paper is a restatement of my earlier analysis of this argument (1954), Revised in the light of critical comments by other scholars and of closer study of the text. It includes a critical discussion of an alternative formalization of the argument, First offered by wilfrid sellars (1955) and retained (with modifications) by colin strang (1963), Which eliminates successfully the inconsistency of the premises of the argument but has dubious support from plato's text|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ermelinda Valentina Di Lascio (2004). Third Men: The Logic of the Sophisms at Arist. SE 22, 178b36–170a10. Topoi 23 (1):33-59.
Plato (1986). Plato's Sophist: Part II of The Being of the Beautiful. University of Chicago Press.
W. K. C. Guthrie (1963). Plato on Man and Society I. M. Crombie: An Examination of Plato's Doctrines. I: Plato on Man and Society. Pp. Xii+395. London: Routledge, 1962. Cloth, 4.2s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (03):278-280.
David Robjant (2012). The Earthy Realism of Plato's Metaphysics, Or: What Shall We Do with Iris Murdoch? Philosophical Investigations 35 (1):43-67.
Gregory Vlastos (1947). Plato's Theory of Man. Philosophical Review 56 (2):184-193.
Richard Sharvy (1986). Plato's Causal Logic and the Third Man Argument. Noûs 20 (4):507-530.
D. T. J. Bailey (2009). The Third Man Argument. Philosophy Compass 4 (4):666-681.
Spiro Panagiotou (1971). Vlastos on Parmenides 132a1-B2: Some of His Text and Logic. Philosophical Quarterly 21 (84):255-259.
S. Marc Cohen (1971). The Logic of the Third Man. Philosophical Review 80 (4):448-475.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads81 ( #11,757 of 739,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,701 of 739,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?