David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2003)
Richard Hooker (1554-1600) has traditionally been seen as the first systematic defender of an Anglican via media between Rome and Geneva. Revisionists have argued recently, however, that Hooker was in fact a thoroughly Reformed theologian. Dr Voak takes issue with this interpretation, arguing that Hooker over time became highly critical of numerous Reformed positions. Beginning with philosophical principles underlying Hooker's theology (e.g. free will, resistibility of grace), the book then considers issues such as original sin, justification and sanctification, merit and the religious authority of scripture, reason, and tradition. Finally, Hooker's late manuscripts are examined, in which he defends himself from the charge of heresy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$143.19 used (14% off) $149.62 new (10% off) $156.75 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
W. B. Patterson (2011). Richard Hooker, Reformer and Platonist. By W. J. Torrance Kirby, Richard Hooker and His Early Doctrine of Justification: A Study of His Discourse of Justification. By Corneliu C. Simut, The Doctrine of Salvation in the Sermons of Richard Hooker. By Corneliu C. Simut and The Evolving Reputation of Richard Hooker: An Examination of Responses, 1600–1714. By Michael Brydon. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 52 (3):511-513.
Richard Bellon (2006). Joseph Hooker Takes a "Fixed Post": Transmutation and the "Present Unsatisfactory State of Systematic Botany", 1844-1860. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 39 (1):1 - 39.
Michael Sudduth (2009). Revisiting the ‘Reformed Objection’ to Natural Theology. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (2):37-62.
John Beversluis (1995). Reforming the “Reformed” Objection to Natural Theology. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):189-206.
John Platt (1982). Reformed Thought and Scholasticism: The Arguments for the Existence of God in Dutch Theology, 1575-1650. E.J. Brill.
Richard Arneson (2005). Sophisticated Rule Consequentialism: Some Simple Objections. Philosophical Issues 15 (1):235–251.
Holly Smith (2010). Measuring the Consequences of Rules. Utilitas 22 (4):413-433.
Frederick C. Beiser (1996). The Sovereignty of Reason: The Defense of Rationality in the Early English Enlightenment. Princeton University Press.
Richard Hooker (1995). Book-Reviews. British Journal of Aesthetics 35 (4):409-410.
Richard Hooker (1992). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 32 (2):409-410.
Richard Hooker (1993). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (3):409-410.
Richard Hooker (1998). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (2):409-410.
Wayne David Christensen & Cliff A. Hooker (2001). Self-Directed Agents. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (Supplement):19-52.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?