Emmanuel Levinas and the Judaism of the Good Samaritan
Levinas Studies 3:193-208 (2008)
| Abstract | Any thoughtful reading of Levinas must grapple with what is implied by his notion that the Other is “higher” than the self — that the Other is “one for whom I can do all and to whom I owe all”? (EI 89). At least two evident issues arise when we wonder what it would mean to live with and by this notion. Without fail, newcomers to Levinas’s ideas raise these two issues. The first centers on the question: What is my responsibility to strangers? That is, if I “owe all” to a stranger in need to the point where his or her welfare and life come before mine, how can I possibly address the interests of my loved ones, friends, colleagues, and fellow citizens, not to mention my own needs? Moreover, is Levinas suggesting that we have a moral duty to be saints? The second issue revolves around the question: What is the responsibility of a victim toward her persecutor? This can easily lead to asking, is Levinas implying that a Jew being herded off to Auschwitz “owes everything” tohis Nazi captor? Also, what can it mean for a victim to encounter the face of a rapist and to “substitute” herself for him? And should she? I shall approach these persistent issues by first explaining how Levinas grounds his claims that the face-to-face-relationship is asymmetrical and that “I am responsible for the Other, without waiting for reciprocity, were I to die for it” (EI 98) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Michael L. Morgan (2005). Levinas and Judaism. Levinas Studies 1:1-17.
Lawrence Burns (2008). Identifying Concrete Ethical Demands in the Face of the Abstract Other: Emmanuel Levinas' Pragmatic Ethics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (3):315-335.
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Emmanuel Lévinas (2001). Is It Righteous to Be?: Interviews with Emmanuel Lévinas. Stanford University Press.
Martine Leibovici (2006). Appartitre Et Visibilite. Le Monde Selon Hannah Arendt Et Emmanuel Levinas. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):55-71.
Marina Riemslagh (2008). The Face-to-Face as Asymmetrical and Reciprocal Revelation : Founding the Ethics of the Process of Pastoral Counseling in the Footsteps of Levinas. In Roger Burggraeve (ed.), The Awakening to the Other: A Provocative Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. Peeters.
Sara E. Roberts (2000). Rethinking Justice. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):5-12.
Ephraim Meir (2008). Levinas's Jewish Thought: Between Jerusalem and Athens. The Hebrew University Magnes Press.
Diane Perpich (2008). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford University Press.
W. Wolf Diedrich (2008). Levinas' Christian Readers : Judaism's Other? In Roger Burggraeve (ed.), The Awakening to the Other: A Provocative Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. Peeters.
Annemie Dillen (2008). Infinite Responsibility and 'Good Enough Parenting' : The Challenge of Levinas' Thought for Family Ethics. In Roger Burggraeve (ed.), The Awakening to the Other: A Provocative Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. Peeters.
Peter Gratton (2005). Heidegger and Levinas on the Question of Temporality. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:157-168.
Edith Wyschogrod (2000). Emmanuel Levinas: The Problem of Ethical Metaphysics. Fordham University Press.
Emmanuel Lévinas (2003). On Escape =. Stanford University Press.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-03-18Total downloads2 ( #234,778 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |

