A Response to Dr. Barbara Sain's “Expression in the Theo-Logic”

Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):323-329 (2007)
After identifying points of agreement between Karl Rahner and Hans Urs von Balthasar on topics raised by Dr. Sain’s essay, this response raises questions about the deeper foundations of the substantial differences between them. It suggests that the appeal to contrast in their starting-points (Goethe versus Kant) as an explanation is not adequate and suggests lines of further inquiry which might be pursued further
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtheol2007191/217
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Barbara K. Sain (2007). Expression in the Theo-Logic. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):301-322.
Hashi Hisaki (2008). The Logic of Non-Verbality. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:69-75.
David Theo Goldberg (2001). Response to Naomi Zack. Philosophia Africana 4 (1):69-72.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #407,986 of 1,902,527 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #195,746 of 1,902,527 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.