Calculus ratiocinator versus characteristica universalis? The two traditions in logic, revisited
History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (1):3-14 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEdward N. Zalta (1997). The Modal Object Calculus and its Interpretation. In M. de Rijke (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic. Kluwer.
Andrzej Wiśniewski & Vasilyi Shangin (2006). Socratic Proofs for Quantifiers★. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (2):147 - 178.
Sara Negri (2002). Varieties of Linear Calculi. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (6):569-590.
E. -W. Stachow (1976). Completeness of Quantum Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):237 - 280.
Massimo Mugnai (2005). Calculus Universalis. The Leibniz Review 15:169-181.
Nino B. Cocchiarella (1988). Predication Versus Membership in the Distinction Between Logic as Language and Logic as Calculus. Synthese 77 (1):37 - 72.
Wilhelm Risse (1969). Die Characteristica Universalis bei Leibniz. Studi Internazionali di Filosofia 1:107-116.
Arianna Betti (2010). Leśniewski's Characteristica Universalis. Synthese 174 (2):295-314.
O. Bradley Bassler (1998). Lingua Universalis V. Calculus Ratiocinator. The Review of Metaphysics 52 (2):457-458.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads23 ( #53,739 of 548,941 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,091 of 548,941 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
