Pragmatism and 'compassionate' political change: Some implications of Richard Rorty's anti-foundationalist liberalism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (5):537-557 (2002)
This paper calls into question Richard Rorty's recasting of the traditional justifications of liberal political philosophy in an anti-foundationalist ironic mould. Rorty suggests not only that his irony is compatible with the liberal commitments to human flourishing but also that it can clear up many of the conceptual difficulties that liberal reformers face today. Two objections are raised against the Rortian approach to politics, one conceptual, the other practical. Conceptually, because Rorty does not wish to burden political irony and imagination with a constraining political theory, his proposal increases the likelihood that two liberal commitments that he judges essential, the separation of the public and the private, and the aversion of wilful cruelty, will clash with one another. Practically, the success of his anti-foundationalist irony among sophisticated liberal reformers is jeopardized by its potentially negative impact upon the non-ironic, metaphysically minded political actors who most need to be brought into the liberal debate. Key Words: irony liberal imagination political theory pragmatism social change Third World.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dazhi Yao (2008). Postmodernist Liberalism: A Critique of Richard Rorty's Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):455-463.
Richard Rorty (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
Randall Peerenboom (2000). The Limits of Irony: Rorty and the China Challenge. Philosophy East and West 50 (1):56-89.
Michael Bacon (2003). Liberal Universalism: On Brian Barry and Richard Rorty. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):41-62.
Ronald Beiner (1993). Richard Rorty's Liberalism. Critical Review 7 (1):15-31.
Paul D. Forster (2000). Problems with Rorty's Pragmatist Defense of Liberalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:345-362.
William M. Curtis (2011). Rorty's Liberal Utopia and Huxley's Island. Philosophy and Literature 35 (1):91-103.
Sterling Lynch (2007). Romantic Longings, Moral Ideals, and Democratic Priorities: On Richard Rorty's Use of the Distinction Between the Private and the Public. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):97 – 120.
Rudi Visker (1999). 'Hold the Being': How to Split Rorty Between Irony and Finitude. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2):27-45.
Michele Marsonet (1996). Richard Rorty's Ironic Liberalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:391-403.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #157,334 of 1,689,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #112,061 of 1,689,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?