David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphysica 10 (1):27-48 (2008)
Creationism with respect to fictional entities, i.e., the position according to which ficta are creations of human practices, has recently become the most popular realist account of fictional entities. For it allows one to hold that there are fictional entities while simultaneously giving such entities a respectable metaphysical status, that of abstract artifacts. In this paper, I will draw what are the ontological and semantical consequences of this position, or at least of all its forms that are genuinely creationist. For some people, these consequences will sound as plagues against the position; for some others, especially realists on ficta, they are welcome results. Although I hold that all forms of genuine creationism have these consequences, I will conclude by explaining why I take moderate creationism, according to which ficta are created by means of a reflexive stance on the make-believe practice grounding them, to be the best of these forms.
|Keywords||Creationism Fictional entities Make-believe Pseudoindividuals Stories Storytelling Worlds|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Merrihew Adams (1981). Actualism and Thisness. Synthese 49 (1):3 - 41.
Ben Caplan (2004). Creatures of Fiction, Myth, and Imagination. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (4):331-337.
Tim Crane (2001). Elements of Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Gregory Currie (1990). The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge University Press.
Gareth Evans (1982). Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Goodman (2004). A Defense of Creationism in Fiction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
Stuart Brock (2010). The Creationist Fiction: The Case Against Creationism About Fictional Characters. Philosophical Review 119 (3):337-364.
Alberto Voltolini (2003). How Fictional Works Are Related to Fictional Entities. Dialectica 57 (2):225–238.
Massimo Pigliucci (2007). The Problems with Creationism. In A. J. Petto & L. R. Godfrey (eds.), Scientists Confront Intelligent Design and Creationism. Norton.
Massimo Pigliucci (2007). Creationism as a Cultural, Not Scientific, Issue. In T. Flynn (ed.), The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief. Prometheus.
Manuel García-Carpintero (2009). Voltolini's Ficta. Dialectica 63 (1):57-66.
Jeffrey Goodman (2003). Where is Sherlock Holmes? Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):183-197.
Jeffrey Koperski (2006). Creationism. In Gary Laderman & Arri Eisen (eds.), Science, Religion, and Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Controversy. Sharpe Reference.
Michael J. Reiss (2011). How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
Alex Orenstein (2007). How Ficta Follow Fiction: A Syncretistic Account of Fictional Entities. Review of Metaphysics 61 (2):449-450.
Alberto Voltolini (1994). Ficta Versus Possibilia. Grazer Philosophische Studien 48:75-104.
Alberto Voltolini (2009). Consequences of Schematism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (1):135-150.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads20 ( #71,683 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #42,743 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?