Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||David Armstrong has argued that the properties of a thing are parts of it and predications are necessary. This article criticises this view and presents and alternative.|
|Keywords||David Armstrong properties predication modality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
David Malet Armstrong (1999). The Causal Theory of Properties: Properties According to Shoemaker, Ellis, and Others. Philosophical Topics 26 (1/2):25-37.
M. Eddon (2007). Armstrong on Quantities and Resemblance. Philosophical Studies 136 (3):385 - 404.
Laird Addis (1967). Particulars and Acquaintance. Philosophy of Science 34 (3):251-259.
Daniel von Wachter (2004). The Ontological Turn Misunderstood: How to Misunderstand David Armstrong’s Theory of Possibility. Metaphysica 5:105-114.
Andrew Newman, The Bundle Theory, the Principle of Unity for Elementary Particulars, and Some Issues.
Joan Pagès (2002). Structural Universals and Formal Relations. Synthese 131 (2):215 - 221.
Alexander Bird (2006). Potency and Modality. Synthese 149 (3):447-52.
David M. Armstrong (2005). Four Disputes About Properties. Synthese 144 (3):1-12.
Added to index2010-02-09
Total downloads33 ( #42,171 of 752,392 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 752,392 )
How can I increase my downloads?