God as substance without substance ontology
In Christian Kanzian & Muhammed Legenhausen (eds.), Substance and Attribute: Western and Islamic Traditions in Dialogue (2007)
| Abstract | This article spells out the reasons for calling God a substance and argues that theism nevertheless does not require substance ontology. It is compatible with an alternative ontology which I call stuff ontology. | |||||||||
| Keywords | God substance ontology | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBarry Smith (1987). The Substance of Brentano's Ontology. Topoi 6 (1):39-49.
Justin Broackes (2006). Substance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):131–166.
Boris Hennig (2008). Substance, Reality, and Distinctness. Prolegomena 7 (1):2008.
Hartmann Romer (2006). Complementarity of Process and Substance. Mind and Matter 4 (1):69-89.
Francesca di Poppa (2010). Spinoza and Process Ontology. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):272-294.
R. E. Houser (2010). The Language of Being and the Nature of God in the Aristotelian Tradition. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:113-132.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-02-09Total downloads44 ( #25,872 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
