How are results represented and modified?
| Abstract | In (Jäger and Blutner 1999), Gerhard Jäger and Reinhard Blutner (henceforth J&B) have launched a forceful attack against the account of the adverb wieder “again” I presented in (Stechow 1995) and (Stechow 1996) There I defended a classical account of the repetitive/restitutive ambiguity exhibited by the adverb wieder, which is very close to early proposals found in the Generative Semantics literature, notably (Morgan 1969) and (McCawley 1971). I argued that German surface syntax shows that something in the style of this old decomposition analysis must be correct. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesRainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli & Arnim von Stechow (eds.) (1979). Semantics From Different Points of View. Springer-Verlag.
Arnim von Stechow (1996). The Different Readings of Wieder 'Again': A Structural Account. Journal of Semantics 13 (2):87-138.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,014 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
