Philosophy of Science 71 (5):972-984 (2004)
|Abstract||The aim of this paper is to examine the usefulness of the Machamer, Darden, and Craver (2000) mechanism approach to gaining an understanding of explanation in cognitive neuroscience. We argue that although the mechanism approach can capture many aspects of explanation in cognitive neuroscience, it cannot capture everything. In particular, it cannot completely capture all aspects of the content and significance of mental representations or the evaluative features constitutive of psychopathology.|
|Keywords||Cognitive Explanation Mechanism Neuroscience Science Craver, C Darden, L Machamer, P|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alexander Powell (2009). Molecules, Cells and Minds: Aspects of Bioscientific Explanation. Dissertation, University of Exeter
Antti Revonsuo (1999). Neuroscience and the Explanation of Psychological Phenomena. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):847-849.
Peter K. Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver (2000). Thinking About Mechanisms. Philosophy Of Science 67 (1):1-25.
William Bechtel (2009). Constructing a Philosophy of Science of Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (3):548-569.
William Bechtel (2010). How Can Philosophy Be a True Cognitive Science Discipline? Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):357-366.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2006). Computational Explanation in Neuroscience. Synthese 153 (3):343-353.
Barbara Eckardvont & Jeffrey S. Poland (2004). Mechanism and Explanation in Cognitive Neuroscience. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):972-984.
James Tabery (2004). Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism. Philosophy of Science 71 (1):1-15.
James G. Tabery (2004). Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism. Philosophy of Science 71 (1):1-15.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads85 ( #10,741 of 722,682 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,891 of 722,682 )
How can I increase my downloads?