David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Logica 42 (2-3):119 - 127 (1983)
The paper is based upon a conception of norms as prescriptions which are neither true nor false. Two norms may be said to contradict one another when the conjunction of (the descriptions of) their contents is a logical contradiction. A norm is said to entail another norm when the first norm and the negation-norm of the second contradict one another. By the negation-norm of an obligation is understood a permission "to the contrary", and by the negation-norm of a permission an obligation "to the contrary". On the basis of these definitions it can be shown that the axioms and theorems of first order standard deontic logic are "normative tautologies". Norms of higher order may be viewed as prescriptions "transmitting the will" of a higher or sovereign authority through a lower or sub-ordinate authority to the norm-subjects. Under this conception of the orders, it is provable that a "complete" system of deontic logic is S4-like
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marco Campenní, Giulia Andrighetto, Federico Cecconi & Rosaria Conte (2009). Normal = Normative? The Role of Intelligent Agents in Norm Innovation. Mind and Society 8 (2):153-172.
David Duarte (2011). Linguistic Objectivity in Norm Sentences: Alternatives in Literal Meaning. Ratio Juris 24 (2):112-139.
Oliver Black (1996). Legal Validity and the Infinite Regress. Law and Philosophy 15 (4):339 - 368.
Karl-Dieter Opp (2001). How Do Norms Emerge? An Outline of a Theory. Mind and Society 2 (1):101-128.
Linda Radzik (2000). Incorrigible Norms: Foundationalist Theories of Normative Authority. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):633-649.
Timothy A. O. Endicott (2011). The Value of Vagueness. In Andrei Marmor & Scott Soames (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law. Oxford University Press, Usa
Amedeo G. Conte (1995). Deóntica de la Negación En Jerzy Sztykgold. Theoria 10 (1):163-190.
U. Schmill (2000). The Dynamic Order of Norms, Empowerment and Related Concepts. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):283-310.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #99,869 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?