On evaluating the scientific status of psychoanalysis
Journal of Philosophy 78 (10):570-572 (1981)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMaarten Boudry & Filip Buekens (2011). The Epistemic Predicament of a Pseudoscience: Social Constructivism Confronts Freudian Psychoanalysis. Theoria 77 (2):159-179.
Julia Borossa & Ivan Ward (eds.) (2009). Psychoanalysis, Fascism, and Fundamentalism. Edinburgh University Press.
Yehoyakim Stein (2005). The Psychoanalysis of Science: The Role of Metaphor, Paraplax, Lacunae, and Myth. Sussex Academic Press.
Dany Nobus (2005). Knowing Nothing, Staying Stupid: Elements for a Psychoanalytic Epistemology. Routledge.
Nathaniel Laor & Joseph Agassi (1988). The Grand Protester: Lacan on the Scientific Status of Psychoanalysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (1):73-100.
Louise Gyler (2010). The Gendered Unconscious: Can Gender Discourses Subvert Psychoanalysis? Routledge.
Margaret Nash (1989). Gr Nbaum and Psychoanalysis. Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):325 – 343.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #87,888 of 549,066 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,066 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
