David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):23 - 26 (1983)
A satisfactory normative theory of acceptable risk would be useful in resolving current disputes over government safety regulation of the workplace, consumer products, and technology. Alan Gewirth has attempted to develop such a theory, arguing from the individual's right not to be harmed by the risk-imposing activities of others. His theory is analyzed in detail, and the difficulties faced by such rights-based (deontological) approaches are pointed out. It is argued that a satisfactory theory will not be of a simple rights-based form. Reason is also given for doubting that it will be of a simple utilitarian form.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Huemer (2010). Lexical Priority and the Problem of Risk. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):332-351.
Similar books and articles
Eric Magnus (1983). Rights and Risks. Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):23-26.
Matti Häyry & Tuija Takala (1999). Biotechnology and the Environment. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:169-178.
Siegfried van Duffel (2013). Natural Rights to Welfare. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):641-664.
George E. Panichas (1985). The Structure of Basic Human Rights. Law and Philosophy 4 (3):343 - 375.
M. J. Zimmerman (2006). Risk, Rights, and Restitution. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):285 - 311.
Manuel Toscano (2012). Language Rights as Collective Rights: Some Conceptual Considerations on Language Rights. Res Publica 27:109-118.
Eleanor Curran (2007). Reclaiming the Rights of the Hobbesian Subject. Palgrave Macmillan.
Eleanor Curran (2002). Hobbes's Theory of Rights – a Modern Interest Theory. Journal of Ethics 6 (1):63-86.
Eric Moore (2002). The Unequal Case for Animal Rights. Environmental Ethics 24 (3):295-312.
Richard Bellamy (2012). Rights as Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):449-471.
Gretchen Larsen & Rob Lawson (2013). Consumer Rights: An Assessment of Justice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):515-528.
Dale Dorsey (2005). Global Justice and the Limits of Human Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):562–581.
Graham Parsons (2012). The Incoherence of Walzer's Just War Theory. Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
Nancy Davis (1988). Rights and Moral Theory: A Critical Review of Judith Thomson's Rights, Restitution, and Risk:Rights, Restitution, and Risk. Judith Jarvis Thomson, William Parent. Ethics 98 (4):806-.
Siegfried Van Duffel (2012). In Defence of the Will Theory of Rights. Res Publica 18 (4):321-331.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads3 ( #679,627 of 1,941,080 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,098 of 1,941,080 )
How can I increase my downloads?