David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):203-216 (2011)
It is still a popular philosophical position to call for a strict “separationism” concerning the private and the public sphere when it comes to religious convictions. Richard Rorty is one prominent supporter of this claim. The traditional critique against this division is mostly built on a particular characterization of religion that is at odds with Rortian assumptions. In this article, however, Rorty is criticized on his own terms turning pragmatically the objection to a fully internal one. What Rorty values most, namely a tolerant and ironic liberalism as the capacity to describe oneself in new and interesting ways is precisely the role, I argue, that religious faith could play under “neo-liberal” conditions
|Keywords||Rorty Irony (Neo)liberalism Privacy Public sphere Metaphysics (Self)understanding|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicholas H. Smith (2005). Rorty on Religion and Hope. Inquiry 48 (1):76 – 98.
Serge Grigoriev (2011). Rorty, Religion, and Humanism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):187-201.
Brad Frazier (2006). The Ethics of Rortian Redescription. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):461-492.
Michele Marsonet (1996). Richard Rorty's Ironic Liberalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:391-403.
Sterling Lynch (2007). Romantic Longings, Moral Ideals, and Democratic Priorities: On Richard Rorty's Use of the Distinction Between the Private and the Public. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):97 – 120.
Rachel Haliburton (1997). Richard Rorty and the Problem of Cruelty. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):49-69.
Ronald Beiner (1993). Richard Rorty's Liberalism. Critical Review 7 (1):15-31.
John T. Lysaker (1996). The Shape of Selves to Come: Rorty and Self-Creation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (3):39-74.
Mark Joseph T. Calano (2008). Unjustifiable Hope. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:27-49.
Michael Bacon (2003). Liberal Universalism: On Brian Barry and Richard Rorty. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):41-62.
Susan Dieleman (2010). Revisiting Rorty: Contributions to a Pragmatist Feminism. Hypatia 25 (4):891-908.
James Flaherty (2005). Rorty, Religious Beliefs, and Pragmatism. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):175-185.
Bob Mesle (2011). An Ethics for Today: Finding Common Ground Between Philosophy and Religion. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (3):285-289.
David Rondel (2009). &Quot;liberalism, Ethnocentrism, and Solidarity: Reflections on Rorty&Quot;. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:55-68.
Mark Dooley (2001). The Civic Religion of Social Hope: A Reply to Simon Critchley. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (5):35-58.
Added to index2011-03-03
Total downloads26 ( #55,322 of 1,004,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?