Journal of Semantics 13 (2):87-138 (1996)
|Abstract||I will defend a purely structural account of the different readings arising from the German adverb wieder ÒagainÓ. We will be concerned with the so-called repetitive/restitutive ambiguity. The claim is that the ambiguity can be resolved entirely in terms of syntactic scope. The theory assumes a rather abstract syntax. In particular, abundant use is made of KratzerÕs (1994) voice phrase, which plays a central role for the derivation of repetitive readings. One of the leading ideas of the analysis is that the structural accusative position has wide scope with respect to the agent relation expressed by the head of the voice phrase. If wieder precedes an accusative object, a repetitive reading is obligatory. If wieder follows the accusative object, two readings are available due to two possible positions of wieder. The analysis is an improvement of the proposal of Stechow (1995). It solves a number of questions left open there and considers a range of new data.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kenneth Liberman (2008). Larry Wieder's Radical Ethno-Inquiries. Human Studies 31 (3):251 - 257.
George Psathas (2008). In Memoriam: Larry Wieder (1938–2006). Human Studies 31 (3).
George Psathas (2008). Larry Wieder (1938-2006). Human Studies 31 (3):241 - 242.
Immanuel Kant, Kritik der Reinen Vernunft Zweite Hin Und Wieder Verbesserte Auflage (1787) (German).
Sandra Ragan (2008). Larry Wieder. Human Studies 31 (3):247 - 249.
D. Lawrence Wieder (2006). Book Symposium. Human Studies 29 (3).
Catherine Wieder, J. Naudin & J. M. Azorin (1998). Binswanger & Schapp: Existential Analysis or Narrative Analysis? Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 29 (2):212-230.
Added to index2009-11-02
Total downloads19 ( #64,434 of 549,130 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,130 )
How can I increase my downloads?