Graduate studies at Western
Metaphysica 5:105-114 (2004)
|Abstract||This article argues that there is a great divide between semantics and metaphysics. Much of what is called metaphysics today is still stuck in the linguistic turn. This is illustrated by showing how Fraser MacBride misunderstands David Armstrong's theory of modality.|
|Keywords||semantics modality David Armstrong metaphysics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David M. Armstrong (1964). Vesey on Bodily Sensations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42 (August):247-248.
Theodore Sider (2005). Another Look at Armstrong's Combinatorialism. Noûs 39 (4):679–695.
TIm de Mey & Markku Keinänen (eds.) (2008). Problems From Armstrong. Acta Philosophica Fennica 84.
D. M. Armstrong (1989). A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility. Cambridge University Press.
Javier Kalhat (2008). A Critique of Armstrong's Truthmaking Account of Possibility. Acta Analytica 23 (2):161-176.
Javier Kalhat (2011). Is There A Quasi-Mereological Account of Property Incompatibility? Acta Analytica 26 (2):115-133.
D. M. Armstrong (2010). Sketch for a Systematic Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
David Efird & Tom Stoneham (2006). Combinatorialism and the Possibility of Nothing. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):269 – 280.
Added to index2010-02-09
Total downloads18 ( #74,582 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?