Whatever
| Abstract | Our immediate intuition about (1) is that –ever indicates speaker’s ignorance. We hear the speaker as signaling that she doesn’t know what Arlo is cooking, while at the same time asserting that no matter what Arlo is cooking, there’s a lot of garlic in it. The FR without –ever in (2) carries no such signal of ignorance. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesGideon Rosen (2002). Culpability and Ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):61–84.
L. L. Farrar (2003). In Praise of Ignorance. Critical Review 15 (3-4):339-346.
Erinn Gilson (2011). Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression. Hypatia 26 (2):308-332.
Lisa Heldke (1988). Recipes for Theory Making. Hypatia 3 (2):15 - 29.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,611 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
