In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), The Great Thinkers A-Z. Continuum (2004)
|Abstract||The political and philosophical problems John Rawls set out to solve arise out of the identity and conflicts of interests between citizens. There is identity of interests because social cooperation makes possible for everyone a life that is much better than one outside of society. There is a conflict of interests because people all prefer a larger to a smaller share of the benefits of social cooperation, and people have ideological differences. The problem a theory of justice has to solve is how, in the face of these conflicts, effective social cooperation can come about on terms that are justifiable to all.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ian Hunt (2011). How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice? Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
Marc Fleurbaey, Maurice Salles & John A. Weymark (eds.) (2008). Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes From Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge University Press.
Meena Krishnamurthy (forthcoming). Reconceiving Rawls’s Arguments for Equal Political Liberty and its Fair Value: On Our Higher-Order Interests. Social Theory and Practice.
Cynthia A. Stark (2009). Contractarianism and Cooperation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):73-99.
Hennie Lötter (1999). Rawls, Young, and the Scope of Justice. Theoria 46 (94):90-107.
Jonathan Wolff (2001). John Rawls. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):347-361.
Brian Barry (1995). John Rawls and the Search for Stability:A Thory of Justice John Rawls; Political Liberalism John Rawls. Ethics 105 (4):874-.
Holly Smith Goldman (1980). Rawls and Utilitarianism. In Gene Blocker & Elizabeth Smith (eds.), John Rawls' Theory of Social Justice. Ohio University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #64,458 of 549,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?