David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):273-274 (2004)
According to Roberts, self-experimentation is a viable tool for idea generation in the behavioral sciences. Here we discuss some limitations of this assertion, as well as particular design and data-analytic shortcomings of his experiments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Seth Roberts (2004). Self-Experimentation: Friend or Foe? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):275-287.
Luther H. Martin (2004). Toward a New Scientific Study of Religion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):744-745.
Irene Grote (2004). Self-Experimentation and Self-Management: Allies in Combination Therapies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):266-267.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
Emanuel A. Schegloff (2004). Experimentation or Observation? Of the Self Alone or the Natural World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):271-272.
Joseph Glicksohn (2004). From Methodology to Data Analysis: Prospects for the N = 1 Intrasubject Design. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):264-266.
Simon C. Moore & Joselyn L. Sellen (2004). Can the Process of Experimentation Lead to Greater Happiness? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):271-271.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?