David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This chapter traces the development of structural realism within the scientific realism debate and the wider current of structuralism that has swept the philosophy of the natural sciences in the twentieth century.1 The primary aim is to make perspicuous the many manifestations of structural realism and their underlying claims. Among other things, I will compare structural realism’s various manifestations in order to throw more light onto the relations between them. At the end of the chapter, I will identify the main objections raised against the epistemic form of structural realism. This last task will pave the way for the evaluation of the structural realist answer to the main epistemological question, an evaluation that will be central to the rest of this dissertation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Holger Lyre (2010). Humean Perspectives on Structural Realism. In F. Stadler (ed.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. 381--397.
Matteo Morganti (2004). On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism. Synthese 142 (1):81--107.
Juha Saatsi (2009). Whence Ontological Structural Realism? In M. Suarez (ed.), EPSA Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Springer.
Ioannis Votsis (2005). The Upward Path to Structural Realism. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1361-1372.
Ioannis Votsis, How Not to Be a Realist or Why We Ought to Make It Safe for Closet Structural Realists to Come Out.
Daniel McArthur (2006). Recent Debates Over Structural Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (2):209 - 224.
Added to index2010-07-02
Total downloads127 ( #5,321 of 1,004,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)41 ( #1,534 of 1,004,680 )
How can I increase my downloads?