In Michael Brady (ed.), New Waves in Metaethics. Palgrave Macmillan (2011)
|Abstract||This paper argues that the recent metaethical turn to reasons as the fundamental units of normativity offers no special advantage in explaining a variety of other normative and evaluative phenomena, unless perhaps a form of reductionism about reasons is adopted which is rejected by many of those who advocate turning to reasons.|
|Keywords||Reasons Value Explanation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fred I. Dretske (1971). Reasons, Knowledge, and Probability. Philosophy of Science 38 (2):216-220.
Andrew Reisner (2007). Evidentialism and the Numbers Game. Theoria 73 (4):304-316.
G. F. Schueler (2003). Reasons and Purposes: Human Rationality and the Teleological Explanation of Action. Oxford University Press.
Jennie Louise (2009). Correct Responses and the Priority of the Normative. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):345 - 364.
Attila Tanyi (2006). An Essay on the Desire-Based Reasons Model. Dissertation, Central European University
Stephen Kearns & Daniel Star (2009). Reasons as Evidence. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:215-42.
Simon Robertson (2008). Not so Enticing Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):263 - 277.
James Lenman, Reasons for Action: Justification Vs. Explanation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Andrew Reisner (2009). The Possibility of Pragmatic Reasons for Belief and the Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem. Philosophical Studies 145 (2):257 - 272.
Jonas Olson (2004). Buck-Passing and the Wrong Kind of Reasons. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):295–300.
Added to index2010-02-01
Total downloads110 ( #6,463 of 722,859 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,866 of 722,859 )
How can I increase my downloads?