Graduate studies at Western
In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 7. Oxford University Press (2012)
|Abstract||This paper presents an alternative to the standard view that the evaluations that the so-called "thick" terms and concepts in ethics may be used to convey belong to their sense or semantic meaning. I describe a large variety of linguistic data that are well explained by the alternative view that the evaluations that (at least a very wide range of) thick terms and concepts may be used to convey are a certain kind of defeasible implications of their utterances which can be given a conversational explanation. I then provide some reasons to think that this explanation of the data is superior to the standard view, but a fuller assessment must await further work. In closing I briefly survey the largely deflationary consequences of this account regarding the significance of thick terms and concepts for evaluative thought and judgment.|
|Keywords||moral semantics thick concepts pragmatics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Olle Blomberg (2007). Disentangling the Thick Concept Argument. SATS 8 (2):63-78.
Pekka Väyrynen (2011). Thick Concepts and Variability. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (1).
Debbie Roberts (2011). Shapelessness and the Thick. Ethics 121 (3):489-520.
Olga Ramirez (2012). ‘BOGHOSSIAN's BLIND REASONING’, CONDITIONALIZATION AND THICK CONCEPTS A FUNCTIONAL MODEL. Ethics in Progress Quarterly 3 (1):31-52.
Matti Eklund (2011). What Are Thick Concepts? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):25-49.
Pekka Väyrynen (2008). Slim Epistemology with a Thick Skin. Philosophical Papers 37 (3):389-412.
Adam M. Croom (2010). Thick Concepts, Non-Cognitivism, and Wittgenstein's Rule Following Considerations. South African Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):286-309.
April Flakne (2005). Through Thick and Thin: Validity and Reflective Judgment. Hypatia 20 (3):115-126.
Heather Battaly (2008). Metaethics Meets Virtue Epistemology: Salvaging Disagreement About the Epistemically Thick. Philosophical Papers 37 (3):435-454.
Pekka Väyrynen (2009). Objectionable Thick Concepts in Denials. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):439-469.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads58 ( #20,276 of 723,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,098 of 723,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?