The Ontological Turn Misunderstood: How to Misunderstand David Armstrong's Theory of Possibility

Metaphysica 5 (2):105-114, http://epub.ub.uni-muen (2004)
This article argues that there is a great divide between semantics and metaphysics. Much of what is called metaphysics today is still stuck in the linguistic turn. This is illustrated by showing how Fraser MacBride misunderstands David Armstrong's theory of modality
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,707
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Daniel von von Wachter (2013). Amstrongian Particulars with Necessary Properties. In Ch Svennerlind, J. Almäng & R. Ingthorsson (eds.), Johanssonian Investigations. Ontos Verlag 709--716.
Daniel von Wachter (2002). David Armstrong. Information Philosophie 5:24-29, http://epub.ub.uni-muench.
M. Eddon (2007). Armstrong on Quantities and Resemblance. Philosophical Studies 136 (3):385 - 404.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

28 ( #152,437 of 1,939,032 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

11 ( #50,009 of 1,939,032 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.