David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):381-396 (2008)
In Truth in Aquinas, John Milbank and Catherine Pickstock attempt to render a “radically orthodox” reading of Aquinas that rejects an autonomous realm of natural reason unaided by faith. I argue that Milbank and Pickstock’s account fails as a reading of Aquinas and is problematic as a theory of the relationship between faith and reason. After sketching Milbank and Pickstock’s understanding of the relationship between faith and reason, I examine Aquinas’s doctrines of grace and divine naming in order to show how they resist Milbank and Pickstock’s attempt to do away with the distinct and autonomous category of natural reason. I then conclude by considering how Milbank and Pickstock’s failure to preserve the integrity and autonomy of natural reason ironically tends toward fideism whilesimultaneously threatening to deprive faith of its meaning
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eileen C. Sweeney (2009). Seeing Double. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3):389-420.
William P. Loewe (1996). III. Beyond Secular Reason? Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):447-454.
Paul O'grady (2000). John Milbank, Catherine Pickstock, Graham Ward (Eds) Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology. (London: Routledge, 1998). Pp. X+285. £45.00 Hbk, £14.99 Pbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 36 (2):227-245.
David M. Craig (2004). Naves and Nukes: John Ruskin as "Augustinian" Social Theorist? Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):325 - 356.
Ed L. Miller (1970). Classical Statements on Faith and Reason. New York,Random House.
David Grumett (2005). The Enlightenment of the Magi: Faith and Reason in Matthew 2:1–12. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):3-16.
Paul Lodge (2002). Leibniz, Bayle, and Locke on Faith and Reason. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):575-600.
David Grumett (2005). The Enlightenment of the Magi. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):3-16.
Gordon E. Michalson (2004). Re-Reading the Post-Kantian Tradition with Milbank. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):357 - 383.
Donald A. Crosby (2011). Faith and Reason: Their Roles in Religious and Secular Life. State University of New York Press.
Charles Taylor (2011). Reason, Faith, and Meaning. Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):5-18.
George F. McLean (2000). Faith, Reason, and Philosophy: Lectures at the Al-Azhar, Qum, Tehran, Lahore, and Beijing. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Antonio Sabetta (2012). Faith and Reason: Historical Analysis and Perspectives for the Present. Davies Group, Publishers.
Sebastian Rehnman (2011). Graced Response: John Owen on Faith and Reason. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (4):431-449.
Kenneth J. Konyndyk (1995). Aquinas on Faith and Science. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):3-21.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads17 ( #203,284 of 1,789,820 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #315,596 of 1,789,820 )
How can I increase my downloads?