Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice

Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (10):804-808 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.
Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?Danielle Bromwich & Annette Rid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):521-528.
Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered.Ariella Binik & Charles Weijer - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (4):387-405.
The concept of risk and responsible conduct of research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
26 (#592,813)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Rethinking informed consent in bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1981 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
Informed Consent: Its History, Meaning, and Present Challenges.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):515-523.

View all 17 references / Add more references