David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):51-68 (2009)
This article defends three interconnected premises that together demand for a new way of dealing with moral responsibility in developing and using technological artifacts. The first premise is that humans increasingly make use of dissociated technological delegation. Second, because technologies do not simply fulfill our actions, but rather mediate them, the initial aims alter and outcomes are often different from those intended. Third, since the outcomes are often unforeseen and unintended, we can no longer simply apply the traditional (modernist) models for discussing moral responsibility. We need to reinterpret moral responsibility. A schematic layout of a model on Social Role-Responsibility that incorporates these three premises is presented to allow discussion of a new way of interpreting moral responsibility.
|Keywords||Moral responsibility Technological artifacts Dissociated technological delegation Social-role responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bindu Madhok (2002). The Price of Frankfurt's Compatibilism. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:577-584.
Hans Jonas (1984). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press.
Ronald N. Giere (2008). Human Moral Responsibility is Moral Responsibility Enough: A Reply to F. Allan Hanson. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):425-427.
Neil Levy & Michael McKenna (2009). Recent Work on Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):96-133.
William Schweiker (1995). Responsibility and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2012). Moral Responsibility, Technology, and Experiences of the Tragic: From Kierkegaard to Offshore Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):35-48.
Katinka Waelbers (2009). From Assigning to Designing Technological Agency. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):241 - 250.
Deborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2005). Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):99-107.
Tsjalling Swierstra & Katinka Waelbers (2012). Designing a Good Life: A Matrix for the Technological Mediation of Morality. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):157-172.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #118,509 of 1,013,238 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?