Impossible propositions and the forms of objects in Wittgenstein's tractatus
Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):190-198 (1995)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames Conant & Cora Diamond (2004). On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely: Reply to Meredith Williams and Peter Sullivan. In Max Kölbel & Bernhard Weiss (eds.), Wittgenstein's lasting significance. Routledge.
Anthony Palmer (2011). Propositions, Properties and Relations: Wittgenstein's “Notes on Logic” and the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 34 (1):77-93.
Nikolay Milkov (2003). The Method of the Tractatus. Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 11:139-41.
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
Paul D. Wienpahl (1964). Wittgenstein and the Naming Relation. Inquiry 7 (1-4):329 – 347.
Ian Proops (2004). Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.
Michael Scanlan (1995). Wittgenstein, Truth-Functions, and Generality. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:175-193.
Christopher Campbell (2011). Categorial Indeterminacy, Generality and Logical Form in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
José L. Zalabardo (2010). The Tractatus on Logical Consequence. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):425-442.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,284 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
