David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Emergent Publications (2011)
Why do policies fail? How can we objectively choose the best policy from two (or more) competing alternatives? How can we create better policies? To answer these critical questions this book presents an innovative yet workable approach. Avoiding Policy Failure uses emerging metapolicy methodologies in case studies that compare successful policies with ones that have failed. Those studies investigate the systemic nature of each policy text to gain new insights into why policies fail. In addition to providing intriguing directions for research, this book also suggests a bold new standard for evaluating policies. While this method is broadly generalizable, specific examples are provided showing how to develop better Economic Policy, Military Policy, and Constitutional Organizations. This book shows scholars, researchers, and policy analysts how to develop more effective policies so that we may achieve our highest aspirations and avoid the horrendous failures of the past.
|Keywords||metapolicy policy robustness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Steven E. Wallis (2014). Abstraction and Insight: Building Better Conceptual Systems to Support More Effective Social Change. Foundations of Science 19 (4):353-362.
Steven E. Wallis (2015). Structures of Logic in Policy and Theory: Identifying Sub-Systemic Bricks for Investigating, Building, and Understanding Conceptual Systems. Foundations of Science 20 (3):213-231.
Similar books and articles
Steven E. Wallis (2010). Toward More Robust Policy Models. Integral Review 6 (1):153-160.
Hugh Compston (2008). The Future of Public Policy. World Futures 64 (1):43 – 59.
Ellen M. Maccarone (2005). The Ethics of Advocacy. Environmental Philosophy 2 (1):44-53.
Meri Koivusalo (2010). Common Health Policy Interests and the Shaping of Global Pharmaceutical Policies. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (4):395-414.
Zachariah Sharek, Robert E. Schoen & George Loewenstein (2012). Bias in the Evaluation of Conflict of Interest Policies. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40 (2):368-382.
Vanessa Scholes (2011). Beyond Serving a Purpose: Additional Ethical Focuses for Public Policy Agents. In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press
Thomas Ponchie, What Framework of Rules is Required to Deliver Economic Policy Coordination Within the Economic and Monetary Union?
R. Juha (2001). Coercive Population Policies, Procreative Freedom, and Morality. Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):67 – 77.
Zachary Hoskins (2009). ''On Highest Authority: Do Religious Reasons Have a Place in Public Policy Debates?''. Social Theory and Practice 35 (3):393-412.
Juha Räikkä (2001). Coercive Population Policies, Procreative Freedom, and Morality. Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):67-77.
Jonathan Wolff (2009). Cognitive Disability in a Society of Equals. Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):402-415.
J. Wilson (2011). Why It's Time to Stop Worrying About Paternalism in Health Policy. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):269-279.
Bert Hoffmann, Why Reform Fails: The 'Politics of Policies' in Costa Rican Telecommunications Liberalization.
Charles D. Raab (1994). Theorising the Governance of Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (1):6 - 22.
Added to index2011-10-22
Total downloads28 ( #97,310 of 1,700,311 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #161,079 of 1,700,311 )
How can I increase my downloads?