David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Biotheoretica 21 (3-4):203-235 (1972)
A specific mapping mechanism is defined as the basic unit of “Biological Memory”. This mechanism must account for the characteristic frequency patterns in the organic world, where future probability is a function of past experience. The conditions for the function of biological memory are analysed. It is found that asymmetry, and irreversibility as a consequence of complexity, are the basic principles of memory function. The essential asymmetries in genetic memory are pointed out, and the problem of bilateral symmetry in a basically asymmetrical organization is briefly outlined.Complexity is defined in terms of symmetry. The thermodynamic arrow of time and the biological arrow of time are discussed in relation to elementarity and complexity with their specific types of repeatabilities: non-accumulative in the first case and accumulative as a result of “copy-reproduction” by memory in the second case. The application of terminology from Information Theory and Thermodynamics to Memory Mechanics is critically considered.The immediate and inevitable consequences of memory function are shown to be irreversible expansion and irreversible, unpredictable diversification, leading to growing complexity and size on all but the sub-molecular levels of biological structure
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Harold F. Blum (1953). Time's Arrow and Evolution. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 13 (3):420-421.
Henri Bergson (1908). L'évolution Créatrice. Philosophical Review 17 (1):84-89.
Citations of this work BETA
I. Walker (1984). The Volterra Competition Equations with Resource - Independent Growth Coefficients and Discussion on Their Biological and Biophysical Implications. Acta Biotheoretica 33 (4):253-270.
I. Walker (1994). Minding the Emperor's New Mind. Acta Biotheoretica 42 (1):77-84.
Similar books and articles
Anton Coenen (2005). Where is the Classic Interference Theory for Sleep and Memory? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):67-68.
Robert A. Wilson (2005). Collective Memory, Group Minds, and the Extended Mind Thesis. Cognitive Processing 6 (4).
Margaret A. Piggott & Elaine K. Perry (2005). New Perspectives on Sleep Disturbances and Memory in Human Pathological and Psychopharmacological States. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):78-79.
Gianfranco Dalla Barba (2000). Memory, Consciousness, and Temporality: What is Retrieved and Who Exactly is Controlling the Retrieval? In Endel Tulving (ed.), Memory, Consciousness, and the Brain: The Tallinn Conference. 138-155.
Pete A. Y. Gunter (2008). Perception, Memory, and Duration: The Binding Problem and the Synthesis of the Past. World Futures 64 (2):125 – 132.
Matthew P. Walker (2005). Past, Present, and the Future: Discussions Surrounding a New Model of Sleep-Dependent Learning and Memory Processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):87-104.
Jonathan K. Foster & Andrew C. Wilson (2005). Sleep and Memory: Definitions, Terminology, Models, and Predictions? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):71-72.
Jeffrey Blustein (2008). The Moral Demands of Memory. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #187,512 of 1,906,920 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,920 )
How can I increase my downloads?