David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):259-274 (1981)
This article assesses what standards of safety and certainty of diagnosis need to be met in the determination of brain death. Recent medical, legal, and philosophical developments on brain death are summarized. It is argued that epistemologically adequate standards require the finding of whole-brain death rather than destruction of the cortex. Because of the possibility of positive error in misdiagnosing death, a tutioristic approach of being on the safe side is advocated. Given uncertainties in diagnosis of so-called vegetative states like the apallic syndrome, anything less than whole-brain death, especially given the present state of diagnostic capability, should not qualify as an argument for removing therapy specifically on grounds that the patient is dead.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Douglas N. Walton (1982). Brain Death: Ethical Considerations. Philosophical Review 91 (4):656-657.
George J. Annas (1980). Refusing Medication in Mental Hospitals. Hastings Center Report 10 (1):21-22.
George J. Annas (1980). Quinlan, Saikewicz, and Now Brother Fox. Hastings Center Report 10 (3):20-21.
Citations of this work BETA
Georges Rey (1983). The Lack of a Case for Mental Duality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):733.
Roland Puccetti (1983). Holograms, History, Mental Agnosticism, and Testability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):735.
John L. Bradshaw (1983). Mental Duality, Unity and Multiplicity, and a Holographic Model of the Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):732.
David L. Wilson (1983). A Proposed Experimental Test of Puccetti's Dual Consciousness Hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):735.
Lauren Julius Harris (1983). Henry Holland on the Hypothesis of Duality of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):732.
Similar books and articles
Ronald E. Cranford & Barbara Killpatrick (1981). Tests in the Diagnosis of Brain Death: The Role of the Radioisotope Brain Scan. Bioethics Quarterly 3:67-72.
G. Khushf (2010). A Matter of Respect: A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule and of a "Whole-Brain" Criterion for Determination of Death. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3):330-364.
Mike Nair-Collins (2010). Death, Brain Death, and the Limits of Science: Why the Whole-Brain Concept of Death Is a Flawed Public Policy. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (3):667-683.
Winston Chiong (2005). Brain Death Without Definitions. Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
Tom Tomlinson (1984). The Conservative Use of the Brain-Death Criterion – a Critique. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):377-394.
Robert J. Wilkus (1980). The EEG as Confirmatory Evidence of Brain Death: Previous and Current Approaches. [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 2 (1):39-45.
T. Forcht Dagi & Rebecca Kaufman (2001). Clarifying the Discussion on Brain Death. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (5):503 – 525.
Hans-Martin Sass (1992). Criteria for Death: Self-Determination and Public Policy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):445-454.
Ari Joffe (2010). Are Recent Defences of the Brain Death Concept Adequate? Bioethics 24 (2):47-53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #105,336 of 1,725,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #183,615 of 1,725,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?