Four concepts of validity: Reflections on inclusive and exclusive positivism
| Abstract | A discussion of four concepts of legal validity and how these might help understand the role of constitutional moral tests for legal validity. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesM. H. & G. W. (1998). Continuity and Change in Legal Positivism. Law and Philosophy 17 (3):233-250.
G. Sartor (2000). Legal Validity as Doxastic Obligation: From Definition to Normativity. Law and Philosophy 19 (5):585-625.
U. Schmill (2000). The Dynamic Order of Norms, Empowerment and Related Concepts. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):283-310.
Matthew H. Kramer (2009). Moral Principles and Legal Validity. Ratio Juris 22 (1):44-61.
Matthew Grellette (2010). Legal Positivism and the Separation of Existence and Validity. Ratio Juris 23 (1):22-40.
Scott J. Shapiro (2009). Was Inclusive Legal Positivism Founded on a Mistake? Ratio Juris 22 (3):326-338.
Peter Schroeder-Heister (2006). Validity Concepts in Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Synthese 148 (3):525 - 571.
Wilfrid J. Waluchow (1994). Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Vittorio Villa (2009). Inclusive Legal Positivism, Legal Interpretation, and Value-Judgments. Ratio Juris 22 (1):110-127.
Robert Alexy (2008). On the Concept and the Nature of Law. Ratio Juris 21 (3):281-299.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
