David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Columbia University Press (2010)
In 1962, the philosopher Richard Taylor used six commonly accepted presuppositions to imply that human beings have no control over the future. David Foster Wallace not only took issue with Taylor's method, which, according to him, scrambled the relations of logic, language, and the physical world, but also noted a semantic trick at the heart of Taylor's argument. Fate, Time, and Language presents Wallace's brilliant critique of Taylor's work. Written long before the publication of his fiction and essays, Wallace's thesis reveals his great skepticism of abstract thinking made to function as a negation of something more genuine and real. He was especially suspicious of certain paradigms of thought-the cerebral aestheticism of modernism, the clever gimmickry of postmodernism-that abandoned "the very old traditional human verities that have to do with spirituality and emotion and community." As Wallace rises to meet the challenge to free will presented by Taylor, we witness the developing perspective of this major novelist, along with his struggle to establish solid logical ground for his convictions. This volume, edited by Steven M. Cahn and Maureen Eckert, reproduces Taylor's original article and other works on fatalism cited by Wallace. James Ryerson's introduction connects Wallace's early philosophical work to the themes and explorations of his later fiction, and Jay Garfield supplies a critical biographical epilogue.
|Keywords||Fatalism Free Will Richard Taylor David Foster Wallace|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.40 used (63% off) $9.98 new (50% off) $15.81 direct from Amazon (21% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven M. Cahn (1967). Fate, Logic, and Time. New Haven, Yale University Press.
David Buller (1995). On the 'Standard' Argument for Fatalism. Philosophical Papers 24 (2):111-125.
Simon Saunders & David Wallace (2008). Saunders and Wallace Reply. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):315-317.
Ardaser Sorabjee N. Wadia (1931). Fate and Free-Will. Toronto, J.M. Dent & Sons, Ltd..
David McPherson & Charles Taylor (2012). Re-Enchanting the World: An Interview with Charles Taylor. Philosophy and Theology 24 (2):275-294.
S. V. Salahuddin (2009). Destiny or Free Will: The Human Paradox. Paramount Publishing Enterprise.
R. Jay Wallace (1997). The Metaphysics of Free Will. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 94 (3):156-159.
David Armstrong (1980). Identity Through Time. In Peter van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor. Reidel. 67-78.
F. A. Carnevale & D. M. Weinstock (2011). Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):329-334.
Christopher Evan Franklin (2013). A Theory of the Normative Force of Pleas. Philosophical Studies 163 (2):479-502.
Thomas Taylor (1969). Thomas Taylor the Platonist: Selected Writings. London, Routledge & K. Paul.
A. E. Taylor (1911). Book Review:Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Henri Bergson, F. L. Pogson. [REVIEW] Ethics 21 (3):350-.
Robert C. Solomon (2003). On Fate and Fatalism. Philosophy East and West 53 (4):435-454.
Richard Sharvy (1963). A Logical Error in Taylor's "Fatalism". Analysis 23 (4):96 -.
Richard Taylor (1962). Fatalism. Philosophical Review 71 (1):56-66.
Added to index2012-09-11
Total downloads3 ( #220,511 of 1,004,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,683 )
How can I increase my downloads?