Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 22 (5-6):82 - 85 (1971)
|Abstract||In nelson goodman's "languages of art" a symbol system must be 'finitely differentiated', both syntactically and semantically, to count as a 'notation'. goodman's formulations of these differentiation requirements are seriously defective. it is shown that most of the examples of systems which he claims fail these requirements, do not fail them as they are stated. reformulations of the two requirements are offered, which accord with the examples and seem otherwise acceptable|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Terry Atkinson (ed.) (1974). Art & Language: [Proceedings I-Vi: Ausstellung], Kunstmuseum Luzern, [27. Januar-24. Februar 1974: Katalog]. [S.N..
Frank Lucash (1993). The Philosophical Method of the Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect and its Application to the Ethics. Philosophy and Theology 7 (3):311-322.
Kendall L. Walton (1988). What is Abstract About the Art of Music? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46 (3):351-364.
Monroe C. Beardsley (1978). Languages of Art and Art Criticism. Erkenntnis 12 (1):95 - 118.
Jenefer Robinson (2000). Languages of Art at the Turn of the Century. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (3):213-218.
P. P. J. (1897). Lindsay's Introduction to Latin Textual Emendation An Introduction to Latin Textual Emendation, Based on the Text of Plautus. By W. M. Lindsay, M.A., Fellow of Jesus College, (Oxford. Macmillan. 1896. Pp. Xii, 131. Price 3s. 6d.). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 11 (08):408-.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2000). From Languages of Art to Art in Mind. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (3):227-231.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,949 of 739,739 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,739 )
How can I increase my downloads?